- From: Thomas Francart <thomas.francart@sparna.fr>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:23:23 +0200
- To: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPugn7UiDfwx-HZKOQrkO0Kr7TtpxzKfBTNBGthn7Vxm0cWhWA@mail.gmail.com>
Hello In the context of the ongoing proposed legal/legislation extension [1], we were suggested to reuse the "status" property instead of our "legislationLegalForce" referring to "LegalForceStatus" enumeration. We have nothing against the idea of using "status" instead of "legislationLegalForce" if we can keep the "LegalForceStatus" enumeration, except that *"status" is currently defined in the health-lifesci extension* [2] This raises some questions : - What is the process for reusing terms from another extension ? should they be moved to core first, before being reused ? - Should I go ahead and broaden the definition of "status" and its allowed range in the health-lifesci extension in my proposed pull request ? or should this be done by the responsible of the health-lifesci extension ? - Should I simply open a separate issue to ask to broaden the definition of "status" ? My questions are really on the process/governance associated to the possible reuse of a property across extensions. Best regards Thomas [1] : https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1156 [2] : https://health-lifesci.schema.org/status -- *Thomas Francart* -* SPARNA* Web de *données* | Architecture de l'*information* | Accès aux *connaissances* blog : blog.sparna.fr, site : sparna.fr, linkedin : fr.linkedin.com/in/thomasfrancart tel : +33 (0)6.71.11.25.97, skype : francartthomas
Received on Monday, 17 October 2016 15:24:15 UTC