Re: Schema.org generator

HI Hans,

Thank you for your answers.

Again a quick response

On 18 March 2016 at 15:13, Hans Polak <info@polak.es> wrote:

> Hi Richard,
>
>
>    - This *only* generates Microdata. I thought JSON (at least) already
>    has a tool.
>
> Schema.org approaches all three syntaxes with equal importance.  If a
generator tool was to be integrated with the schema.org site (*and I am not
saying it should or should not*) it should have that equality of approach.

>
>    - This doesn't, actually, validate against the Google testing tool.
>    The user has to *manually* copy and paste it. So, any tool should work.
>
> Ah I see.  In that case I would suggest a simple
copy-output-to-paste-buffer option with prominent links to the several
available validation tools - Google, Bing, Yandex, Structurd Data Linter,
RDF Translator, etc.

>
>    - If I understand this correctly, my tool can handle related types
>    without any problem (AJAX).
>
> Does that mean when user drops on the *seller* property of *Offer* they
get taken to an *Organisation* form to fill in?

>
>    - It will *only* output the information provided by the user. So, if
>    the user adds both...
>
> So referencing the previous point they would get the choice of a *Person*
or *Organization* to fill in?

>
>    - The user is in charge of choosing the subtype. The tool will handle
>    that.
>
> Providing a list to choose from?

>
>    - Yes, it does track schema.org. The bot can be set-up to check every
>    24 hours, more often, less often...
>
> Excellent.

>
>    - At this moment, only the core will be handled.
>    http://schema.org/docs/full.html
>
> So once an equivalent file that included extensions was available, it
will?


Sorry for short replies - I’ll see if I can find time to make a more
detailed look.

~Richard

>
>    -
>
> Hans
>
>
> On 03/18/2016 02:06 PM, Richard Wallis wrote:
>
> Hi Hans,
>
> This looks interesting.  I have not as yet had time to delve into the
> technical documentation, but the following questions come to mind looking
> at the documentation.
>
>    - Will it produce all three serialisations as output - Microdata,
>    RDFa, JSON-LD
>    - Will it validate against more than just the Google testing tool
>    - How does it handle related types.  i.e.. A *PriceSpecification*
>    linked to an *Offer* for a *Product* offered by a *seller*
>    *Organisation*
>    - How will it handle properties with more than one type in its range
>     e.g.. for *creator* how to choose to create *Person* or *Organization*
>    schema
>    - How will you choose which subtype to create e.g A property expecting
>    a CreativeWork could reference a *Book, *a* Painting,* or a
>    *SoftwareApplication*
>    - Does it track the evolution of the vocabulary - getting its
>    structure from the live schema.org site
>    - Will it handle extensions such as bib.schema.org
>
> ~Richard
>
> Richard Wallis
> Founder, Data Liberate
> http://dataliberate.com
> Linkedin:  <http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis>
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis
> Twitter: @rjw
>
> On 18 March 2016 at 12:21, Hans Polak <info@polak.es> wrote:
>
>> I've uploaded everything to Github.
>>
>> https://github.com/GUI-Junkie/Schema.org-Generator
>>
>> Yours sincerely,
>> Hans Polak
>>
>>
>> On 03/18/2016 10:58 AM, Hans Polak wrote:
>>
>> Good morning,
>>
>> Yesterday, I released a software package for schema.org under the GNU
>> GPL.
>>
>> This software generates valid schema's in HTML5 format. I would like to
>> integrate this at <http://schema.org/generator/>
>> http://schema.org/generator/ if possible. Here is the Online Help
>> <http://polak.es/generator_help/index.html>
>>
>> The system requirements are: Python3 (with or without Apache2). Here is
>> the Technical documentation <http://polak.es/generator_tech/index.html>
>>
>> tar.gz <http://polak.es/generator.tar.gz> file, checksums
>> <http://polak.es/en/generator.html>
>>
>> Yours sincerely,
>> Hans Polak
>>
>>
>>
>
>