- From: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:41:12 +0000
- To: Hans Polak <info@polak.es>
- Cc: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAD47Kz48+6BKe49g1K-uSZOgjKNKDyhDKCE3t3HEihfghEMJcw@mail.gmail.com>
HI Hans, Thank you for your answers. Again a quick response On 18 March 2016 at 15:13, Hans Polak <info@polak.es> wrote: > Hi Richard, > > > - This *only* generates Microdata. I thought JSON (at least) already > has a tool. > > Schema.org approaches all three syntaxes with equal importance. If a generator tool was to be integrated with the schema.org site (*and I am not saying it should or should not*) it should have that equality of approach. > > - This doesn't, actually, validate against the Google testing tool. > The user has to *manually* copy and paste it. So, any tool should work. > > Ah I see. In that case I would suggest a simple copy-output-to-paste-buffer option with prominent links to the several available validation tools - Google, Bing, Yandex, Structurd Data Linter, RDF Translator, etc. > > - If I understand this correctly, my tool can handle related types > without any problem (AJAX). > > Does that mean when user drops on the *seller* property of *Offer* they get taken to an *Organisation* form to fill in? > > - It will *only* output the information provided by the user. So, if > the user adds both... > > So referencing the previous point they would get the choice of a *Person* or *Organization* to fill in? > > - The user is in charge of choosing the subtype. The tool will handle > that. > > Providing a list to choose from? > > - Yes, it does track schema.org. The bot can be set-up to check every > 24 hours, more often, less often... > > Excellent. > > - At this moment, only the core will be handled. > http://schema.org/docs/full.html > > So once an equivalent file that included extensions was available, it will? Sorry for short replies - I’ll see if I can find time to make a more detailed look. ~Richard > > - > > Hans > > > On 03/18/2016 02:06 PM, Richard Wallis wrote: > > Hi Hans, > > This looks interesting. I have not as yet had time to delve into the > technical documentation, but the following questions come to mind looking > at the documentation. > > - Will it produce all three serialisations as output - Microdata, > RDFa, JSON-LD > - Will it validate against more than just the Google testing tool > - How does it handle related types. i.e.. A *PriceSpecification* > linked to an *Offer* for a *Product* offered by a *seller* > *Organisation* > - How will it handle properties with more than one type in its range > e.g.. for *creator* how to choose to create *Person* or *Organization* > schema > - How will you choose which subtype to create e.g A property expecting > a CreativeWork could reference a *Book, *a* Painting,* or a > *SoftwareApplication* > - Does it track the evolution of the vocabulary - getting its > structure from the live schema.org site > - Will it handle extensions such as bib.schema.org > > ~Richard > > Richard Wallis > Founder, Data Liberate > http://dataliberate.com > Linkedin: <http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis > Twitter: @rjw > > On 18 March 2016 at 12:21, Hans Polak <info@polak.es> wrote: > >> I've uploaded everything to Github. >> >> https://github.com/GUI-Junkie/Schema.org-Generator >> >> Yours sincerely, >> Hans Polak >> >> >> On 03/18/2016 10:58 AM, Hans Polak wrote: >> >> Good morning, >> >> Yesterday, I released a software package for schema.org under the GNU >> GPL. >> >> This software generates valid schema's in HTML5 format. I would like to >> integrate this at <http://schema.org/generator/> >> http://schema.org/generator/ if possible. Here is the Online Help >> <http://polak.es/generator_help/index.html> >> >> The system requirements are: Python3 (with or without Apache2). Here is >> the Technical documentation <http://polak.es/generator_tech/index.html> >> >> tar.gz <http://polak.es/generator.tar.gz> file, checksums >> <http://polak.es/en/generator.html> >> >> Yours sincerely, >> Hans Polak >> >> >> > >
Received on Friday, 18 March 2016 15:41:41 UTC