- From: Hans Polak <info@polak.es>
- Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:03:02 +0100
- To: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
- Cc: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <56EC26B6.1020303@polak.es>
Hi Richard, It's a pity my hosting doesn't do Python, otherwise I could link you to it. The other syntaxes can be added in a next version. I focused on microdata because that was the problem I needed to solve and because I thought there was already a tool for json. My idea is to add a validate button to avoid the copypaste. Google allows it (I think). The other options can be added, no problemo. I hope these screenshots clarify it a tat. Cheers, Hans On 03/18/2016 04:41 PM, Richard Wallis wrote: > HI Hans, > > Thank you for your answers. > > Again a quick response > > On 18 March 2016 at 15:13, Hans Polak <info@polak.es > <mailto:info@polak.es>>wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > * This /only/ generates Microdata. I thought JSON (at least) > already has a tool. > > Schema.org approaches all three syntaxes with equal importance. If a > generator tool was to be integrated with the schema.org > <http://schema.org> site (/and I am not saying it should or should > not/) it should have that equality of approach. > > * This doesn't, actually, validate against the Google testing > tool. The user has to /manually/ copy and paste it. So, any > tool should work. > > Ah I see. In that case I would suggest a simple > copy-output-to-paste-buffer option with prominent links to the several > available validation tools - Google, Bing, Yandex, Structurd Data > Linter, RDF Translator, etc. > > * If I understand this correctly, my tool can handle related > types without any problem (AJAX). > > Does that mean when user drops on the /seller/ property of /Offer/ > they get taken to an /Organisation/ form to fill in? > > * It will /only/ output the information provided by the user. > So, if the user adds both... > > So referencing the previous point they would get the choice of a > /Person/ or /Organization/ to fill in? > > * The user is in charge of choosing the subtype. The tool will > handle that. > > Providing a list to choose from? > > * Yes, it does track schema.org <http://schema.org>. The bot can > be set-up to check every 24 hours, more often, less often... > > Excellent. > > * At this moment, only the core will be handled. > http://schema.org/docs/full.html > > So once an equivalent file that included extensions was available, it > will? > > > Sorry for short replies - I’ll see if I can find time to make a more > detailed look. > > ~Richard > > * > > > Hans > > > On 03/18/2016 02:06 PM, Richard Wallis wrote: >> Hi Hans, >> >> This looks interesting. I have not as yet had time to delve into >> the technical documentation, but the following questions come to >> mind looking at the documentation. >> >> * Will it produce all three serialisations as output - >> Microdata, RDFa, JSON-LD >> * Will it validate against more than just the Google testing tool >> * How does it handle related types. i.e.. A >> /PriceSpecification/ linked to an /Offer/ for a /Product/ >> offered by a /seller/ /Organisation/ >> * How will it handle properties with more than one type in its >> range e.g.. for /creator/ how to choose to create /Person/ >> or /Organization/ schema >> * How will you choose which subtype to create e.g A property >> expecting a CreativeWork could reference a /Book, >> /a/Painting,/ or a /SoftwareApplication/ >> * Does it track the evolution of the vocabulary - getting its >> structure from the live schema.org <http://schema.org> site >> * Will it handle extensions such as bib.schema.org >> <http://bib.schema.org> >> >> ~Richard >> >> Richard Wallis >> Founder, Data Liberate >> http://dataliberate.com >> Linkedin: >> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis>http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis >> Twitter: @rjw >> >> On 18 March 2016 at 12:21, Hans Polak <info@polak.es >> <mailto:info@polak.es>> wrote: >> >> I've uploaded everything to Github. >> >> https://github.com/GUI-Junkie/Schema.org-Generator >> >> Yours sincerely, >> Hans Polak >> >> >> On 03/18/2016 10:58 AM, Hans Polak wrote: >>> Good morning, >>> >>> Yesterday, I released a software package for schema.org >>> <http://schema.org> under the GNU GPL. >>> >>> This software generates valid schema's in HTML5 format. I >>> would like to integrate this at http://schema.org/generator/ >>> if possible. Here is the Online Help >>> <http://polak.es/generator_help/index.html> >>> >>> The system requirements are: Python3 (with or without >>> Apache2). Here is the Technical documentation >>> <http://polak.es/generator_tech/index.html> >>> >>> tar.gz <http://polak.es/generator.tar.gz> file, checksums >>> <http://polak.es/en/generator.html> >>> >>> Yours sincerely, >>> Hans Polak >>> >> >> > >
Received on Friday, 18 March 2016 16:03:42 UTC