- From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:18:47 -0500
- To: Elias Kaerle <elias.kaerle@sti2.at>
- Cc: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Message-ID: <CAChbWaNG3Tqnzs83r__URoaJMvFSMLnjOL3qLh7RJb3YCDrYMw@mail.gmail.com>
Elias, I also agree with you that Ski Resort data not really Transport data that your trying to surface for Search Engine users. But at the same time, I can see that your trying to think about important Filter Criteria for folks interested in Skiing. However, that level of detail will only appeal to dedicated enthusiants whom will get those details anyways from specific sites....and not a general search engine like Google, Yahoo, Yandex, Bing, etc. The value that Schema.org brings is where it helps the Search Engines to help users find the data they need... in general. For a search user that is interested in comparing ski resort attributes....he will likely just type "compare ski resorts" and then have a search listing that shows sites like what you might own or maintain with a page that has those same filter criteria...and the search user will just like on that search result listing of "Compare Ski Resorts around your area" or whatever, and then be taken to that page to perform more detailed selections and comparisons. So the real advantage and effort on your part would be to ensure that there is sufficient data that allows the Search Engines to "know" that your site or sites, can actually perform "comparison of ski resorts", etc....and that would be enough for everyone concerned. In other words, don't expect Google, Yahoo, Yandex, Bing, etc...to build specialized Ski Resort Filters that let users of their Search Engines so sub-searching or refined custom searches based on your proposed Filter attributes. Having said all that... your audience may not just be the Search Engines....perhaps its others or specialized applications, etc... then it that case... it might make sense to continue to push and promote your Schema.org proposal. :) Best, Thad +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
Received on Thursday, 21 July 2016 17:19:16 UTC