- From: Elias Kaerle <elias.kaerle@sti2.at>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 15:04:51 +0200
- To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Cc: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Hi Thad, Thank you very much for your thoughts on my suggestion, I really appreciate your feedback. My intention with this suggestion is not to come up with important filter criteria for search engines, nor do I follow any search engine related interests with my suggestion (at least not at the current state search engines are in). When you speak about the level of detail, I think schema.org does a very good job in specifying quite some level of detail when it comes to concepts like sdo/Organization (award, duns, foundingLocation, isicV4, leiCode, naics …), sdo/CreativeWork, sdo/Product or others. Actually, at the current state, Google only recognizes 7 Types for their search mark up (https://developers.google.com/search/docs/guides/mark-up-content) – schema.org currently has 571 types. I think digging a little bit deeper into detail of a very important economic factor like tourism is no disadvantage (as happens in release 3.1 with the extension of sdo/Hotel, see https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/pull/1224). In the case of the ski resort, the number of lifts, slopes and their difficulty and length is as important for a potential customer as the size of a room or the type of bed for a potential hotel customer. Or the number of seats or the legroom for a potential car buyer/flight booker. Doing that all at the same time would be a really big pull request which would probably lead to conflicts and a lot of integrational work. Doing it bit by bit would be a nice and clean approach for accessing a huge field, like tourism, in a manageable way. The value that schema.org brings is, in my understanding, only to a certain (small) extend related to search engines. The idea, and I quote the documentation here, is “a mission to create, maintain, and promote schemas for structured data on the Internet, on web pages, in email messages, and beyond” and to help “Many applications [..] to power rich, extensible experiences.” Schema.org is, in my understanding, the first big movement to make the semantic web real. It helps to structure content on the web, to make that content machine read - and understandable and to power – and that’s where my interest lies – third party applications which use content on the web. Of course schema.org is sponsored by the “big 4” in search engine business, Google, Microsoft, Yahoo and Yandex, and that’s awesome, because they can reach the broadest possible audience, can encourage people to use schema.org on their own websites and they do a really great job in driving the development of schema.org. But, as I understood it, by no means the vocabulary schema.org provides should be restricted to possible relevant search requests a search engine user comes up with. Best, Elias On 21.07.2016 19:18, Thad Guidry wrote: > Elias, > > I also agree with you that Ski Resort data not really Transport data that > your trying to surface for Search Engine users. > > But at the same time, I can see that your trying to think about important > Filter Criteria for folks interested in Skiing. However, that level of > detail will only appeal to dedicated enthusiants whom will get those > details anyways from specific sites....and not a general search engine like > Google, Yahoo, Yandex, Bing, etc. > > The value that Schema.org brings is where it helps the Search Engines to > help users find the data they need... in general. For a search user that > is interested in comparing ski resort attributes....he will likely just > type "compare ski resorts" and then have a search listing that shows sites > like what you might own or maintain with a page that has those same filter > criteria...and the search user will just like on that search result listing > of "Compare Ski Resorts around your area" or whatever, and then be taken to > that page to perform more detailed selections and comparisons. > > So the real advantage and effort on your part would be to ensure that there > is sufficient data that allows the Search Engines to "know" that your site > or sites, can actually perform "comparison of ski resorts", etc....and that > would be enough for everyone concerned. In other words, don't expect > Google, Yahoo, Yandex, Bing, etc...to build specialized Ski Resort Filters > that let users of their Search Engines so sub-searching or refined custom > searches based on your proposed Filter attributes. > > Having said all that... your audience may not just be the Search > Engines....perhaps its others or specialized applications, etc... then it > that case... it might make sense to continue to push and promote your > Schema.org proposal. :) > > Best, > > Thad > +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry> > -- Elias Kärle, MSc Semantic Technology Institute University of Innsbruck ICT - Technologie Park Innsbruck 2nd Floor, Room 3S02 Technikerstrasse, 21a 6020 Innsbruck Austria Tel.: (+43) 512 507 53738 Skype: elias.kaerle
Received on Friday, 22 July 2016 13:05:22 UTC