Re: Next schema.org release - please review sdo-phobos (v2.2) drafts

Hi,

I' d like to bring back the discussion about repeating events, or event
series, see:

https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/240
https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/pull/446

Do we stick to the github issues or mailing list is now preferred?

Cheers,


On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:

> On 15 September 2015 at 20:34, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
> wrote:
> > Adding wordCount to Book (or even CreativeWork) seems like an easy one.
> > (https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/622)
> >
> > Some discussions seem to have simply died after the initial question was
> > answered. We should come up with a policy for closing these issues after
> > they have been dormant for some period of time.
>
> Yes - issues that get closed generally have someone championing them.
> We have a lot of plates spinning... Often (as below) there are a few
> rough edges that need final attention, rather than a complete polished
> yes-or-no design. We might do well to break out sub-issues in such
> situations, rather than have a single gigantic issue thread.
>
> I like the idea of adding wordCount.
>
> Another bibliographic one:
> https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/764 - this is an idea
> for making it possible to describe not-for-profit offers such as
> library holdings / lending, without needing to phrase it as a
> 'seller'. Martin Hepp, Dan Scott, everyone - any views on this?
>
> https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/445 on adding
> ExhibitionEvent was looking promising - but there are a few details,
> e.g. how to link the works in an exhibition. We already have
> workPerformed (for music), workPresented (for movies at a
> ScreeningEvent) - can we generalise this to featuredEvent (an Event
> and the CreativeWorks(s) it features), rather than adding yet another
> specific case e.g. workExhibited?
>
> Dan
>
> > - Vicki
> >
> >
> > Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Schema.org CG,
> >>
> >> Our last release was just over a month ago,
> >> http://schema.org/docs/releases.html#v2.1
> >>
> >> It would be great to wrap up another release in the next week or two.
> >>
> >> There is a draft based on the Github sdo-phobos branch available for
> >> review at
> >>
> >> http://sdo-phobos.appspot.com/docs/releases.html#sdo-phobos
> >>
> >> Please take a look at what's there, but also at any other open issues
> >> that are reaching something approximating consensus and might be easy
> >> to finalize and include without a huge amount more discussion. As
> >> always the open issues list is at
> >> http://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues ...
> >>
> >> cheers,
> >>
> >> Dan
> >>
> >
>
>


-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co