Re: Tourism Schema

On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 20:15:06 +1100, Richard Wallis  
<richard.wallis@dataliberate.com> wrote:

> I agree that disability services is a very important, oft neglected area,
> that will have a place in the discussions around the descriptive needs of
> the tourism domain.  An important part of this being physical  
> accessibility
> features and hazards (e.g.. steps, ramps, elevators access, audio
> enhancement systems, etc.).
>
> This is an area that is much broader than tourism however, I wonder if
> there is a motivated group already in existence that could look  
> delivering
> a proposal for addressing physical accessibly for
> Places/CivicStructures/LocalBusinesses in a similar way that technical
> accessibility has been for CreativeWorks with accessibilityHazard
> <https://schema.org/accessibilityHazard> and accessibilityHazard
> <https://schema.org/accessibilityHazard>.

Yeah, we absolutely should be doing that. So I feel bad, because I'm one  
of the people who should be doing it...

cheers

-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
  chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Received on Thursday, 26 November 2015 13:35:30 UTC