RE: SchemaBibEx and bib.schema.org

Ed,

On Mar 11, 2015 at 5:48PM, Ed Summers <mailto:ehs@pobox.com> wrote:

> Yes, I definitely see the value in this. But a subdomain is not required. The
> schema.org editors could review an external extension and decide to
> incorporate all or bits of it into schema.org proper when they have time.

I assume the schema.org editors will incorporate the bits they think are worthy into schema.org proper. It's the domain-specific remainder bits that don't pass their editorial muster that we still need a place for.

Jeff

Received on Thursday, 12 March 2015 13:44:51 UTC