- From: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:55:23 -0400
- To: "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org>
- Cc: "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
> On Mar 12, 2015, at 9:44 AM, Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org> wrote: > > I assume the schema.org editors will incorporate the bits they think are worthy into schema.org proper. It's the domain-specific remainder bits that don't pass their editorial muster that we still need a place for. Right, so why can't this vocabulary content live externally on the Web (outside of schema.org) until such a time as it is ready to be pulled in? Why incubate it at sub-domains of schema.org? I guess I'm not convinced that perceived SEO and not having to host an html page are worth the cost of complexity at schema.org. //Ed
Received on Thursday, 12 March 2015 13:56:02 UTC