- From: Corey A Harper <corey.harper@nyu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:52:41 -0400
- To: Owen Stephens <owen@ostephens.com>
- Cc: "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>, "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAE4UJ7WSh8b_xR+rwZL2BogQxDtDx8tbZCOySTKbEb=SF0NfDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Dear Richard, Owen, et al., I'd also like to know more about the proposed timeline for discussion here. I'm particularly concerned about the "Archive Containers/Collection" set in Richard's original message. If I remember correctly, the original schema bib group didn't address archival metadata, and there weren't any archivists engaged in the conversation. I think we need to think very carefully about extending the bib extensions into another -- albeit related -- domain without appropriate representation from that group. It was hard enough reaching consensus on the bibliographic stuff the first time around. I suspect this comment is also related to the discussion of Toys and Kits going on in other threads, as those types are largely used in cataloging for special collections & archives. A better sense of timing would be useful, as I think I'd like to start pointing some of my archives metadata colleagues to this thread. Thanks, -Corey On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Owen Stephens <owen@ostephens.com> wrote: > Thanks Richard, > > While I understand that having something in bib.schema.org doesn’t > preclude their use elsewhere, we clearly don’t want to do something that > causes problems further down the line or leads libraries to describe > materials in a way that is different to others using schema.org. If we > had simply approached ‘comics’ as we describe them in libraries we would > have ended up with something much poorer than what we’ve actually got > through the work of Dan and others. > > I’m not that keen on an approach that simply takes what libraries > currently do and converts it into schema.org - I still feel if this is > ‘bib’ schema it should focus on that aspect. Otherwise we should be talking > about ‘lib’ schema instead. > > Anyway, would it be possible for you to lay out a proposed timetable for > discussion and agreement/publication of these elements and properties? > > I’m going to keep going on my concerns about Toy and Kit in a different > thread… > > Owen > > Owen Stephens > Owen Stephens Consulting > Web: http://www.ostephens.com > Email: owen@ostephens.com > Telephone: 0121 288 6936 > > On 15 Apr 2015, at 17:04, Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org> wrote: > > Hi Owen, > > You are right to identify the slightly rushed element of this proposal > as we are hoping to take advantage of an imminent release. > > To that end the set of obvious initial candidates for discussion - most > of BiblioGaph.net <http://bibliogaph.net/> and the comics proposal - were > slimed down by Dan Scott and me into a less controversial sub-set. Neither > of us are precious about any of these. > > The General Bibliographic Types & Properties all came into this proposal > from the BibloGraph.net <http://biblograph.net/> vocabulary, designed as > an open extension to Schema.org <http://schema.org/>. The need for the > types and properties within it came from analysing the bibliographic > descriptions within WorldCat.org <http://worldcat.org/> and therefore by > inference information that librarians needed to capture for their > organisations and collections. > > Within these there are a few new CreativeWork subtypes. Some are fairly > obvious (Newspaper, Atlas, MusicScore, Thesis, Chapter) some less obvious > (Kit, Toy). In support of Kit & Toy I would say they are both used in > bibliographic description - for example in toy collections/libraries in the > same way as kits [I’m sure there could be a better word] of materials are > often catalogued and circulated by libraries. You are right to suggest > that they may well be applicable within other domains, but being in > bib.schema.org does not preclude their use elsewhere or promoting to the > core at a later date. > > Meeting, Agent, & PublicationSeries, although not discussed in this > group have well understood application in describing relationships and > resources in the bibliographic domain. > > The MapCategoryType:CartographicMap > <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/CartographicMap> does not seek to define a > Cartographic as such. It just makes available the ability to differentiate > one from Transit Maps and Seat Maps. > > > The archive containers types and properties are new, and address the > description of how items in an archive are contained as against the > semantic description of those items. The Collection type although of > relevance to archives is equally applicable to library and other > collections. > > What is missing, except for the comic related proposals, are examples to > go with the proposals that we need to work on. > > ~Richard > > On 15 Apr 2015, at 16:20, Owen Stephens <owen@ostephens.com> wrote: > > Richard, > > I feel like breaking down this list further into types and properties > would be useful for discussion? > Also pointers to any existing work/discussions on each type/property? Or a > summary for each thing. I know comics have been discussed extensively and > don’t want to re-hash anything there. On the otherhand some of these are > completely new and I think deserve a bit more consideration before we put > them forward. > > My overarching concern is that we have a list of ‘types’ that are based > on how we currently break things down in libraries, rather than with > specific use cases in mind. For example Kit might be better part of a > learning materials extension, Toy as part of products, and it feels like > ‘cartographic materials’ are probably an area all to themselves. > > I don’t necessarily object to these being part of a bib extension > (certainly ‘atlas’ fits clearly into scope), but some of this feels a bit > rushed unless there is discussion I’ve missed? > > Owen > > Owen Stephens > Owen Stephens Consulting > Web: http://www.ostephens.com > Email: owen@ostephens.com > Telephone: 0121 288 6936 > > On 14 Apr 2015, at 22:26, Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > A few weeks back we discussed how this group or some of its members > could participate as a bibliographic domain group to propose and review a > bibliographic extension to schema.org with the current working name of > bib.schema.org. > > Since then I have been liaising with Dan Brickley and others in the main > Schema.org <http://schema.org/> group who have been working to establish > the hosting software that enables the extension capability. This work is > now close to being ready for release. Dan has indicated that this provides > an excellent opportunity for a bibliographic extension to be one of, if not > the first, enabled and released in this way. In preparation for this, Dan > Scott and I have put together a candidate set of types and properties that > could constitute an initial bib extension release, which this email > introduces. > > There are many potential candidates for new/enhanced types and > properties which the finessing and accepting of which would need to be the > subject of some in depth discussion within this group. To take advantage > of the opportunity to release along with the capability release, however, > we need to agree a starting subset fairly quickly. To that end Dan and I > have drawn up this initial (1.0) proposal consisting of what we believe to > be things that are fairly noncontroversial. > > I list the proposed types and properties below with links to their > representation in a development version of the Schema.org > <http://schema.org/> site. They are in three independent groups of > proposals, for general bibliographic markup; some helpful things for the > physical structure of archives & basic collections; and for comics. > > We can accept/reject either individual types and properties, or a whole > group, because we need to explore things in more depth and defer things to > a later release. I would hope though that fairly quickly we could come to > at least a subset of these as an initial release. > > A reminder that Dan Brickley is still working on the software capable of > handling extensions so please view the content more than how it currently > displays. > > General Bibliographic Types & Properties > > - Agent <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/Agent> > - Atlas <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/Atlas> > - Chapter <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/Chapter> > - Globe <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/Globe> > - Kit <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/Kit> > - Meeting <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/Meeting> > - Newspaper <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/Newspaper> > - MusicScore <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/MusicScore> > - PublicationSeries <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/PublicationSeries> > - Thesis <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/Thesis> > - Toy <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/Toy> > - BookFormatType:AudioBook <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/AudioBook> > - BookFormatType:LargePrintBook > <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/LargePrintBook> > - BookFormatType:PrintBook <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/PrintBook> > - MapCategoryType:CartographicMap > <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/CartographicMap> > - inSupportOf <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/inSupportOf> > - translationOfWork <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/translationOfWork> > - translator <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/translator> > - workTranslation <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/workTranslation> > > > Archive Containers/Collection > > - BoxContainer <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/BoxContainer> > - Collection <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/Collection> > - Container <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/Container> > - FolderContainer <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/FolderContainer> > - Shelf <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/Shelf> > - contains <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/contains> > - containedIn <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/containedIn> > > > Comics > > - ComicIssue <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/ComicIssue> > - ComicSeries <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/ComicSeries> > - ComicStory <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/ComicStory> > - CoverArt <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/CoverArt> > - ComicCoverArt <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/ComicCoverArt> > - BookFormatType:GraphicNovel <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/GraphicNovel> > - artist <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/artist> > - colorist <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/colorist> > - inker <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/inker> > - letterer <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/letterer> > - penciler <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/penciler> > - publisherImprint <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/publisherImprint> > - variantCover <http://sdo-bib.appspot.com/variantCover> > > > I look forward to comments. > > ~Richard. > > > > > -- Corey A Harper Metadata Services Librarian New York University Libraries 20 Cooper Square, 3rd Floor New York, NY 10003-7112 212.998.2479 corey.harper@nyu.edu
Received on Thursday, 16 April 2015 14:53:10 UTC