Re: Proposing Article from Wallis,Richard on 2014-01-15 (public-schemabibex@w3.org from January 2014)

From: Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 20:29:15 +0000
To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
CC: "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1B0FE33F-C063-48FB-A941-179F417B1219@oclc.org>

On 14 Jan 2014, at 22:26, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl<mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl>> wrote:

Also, while we propose a new super-class for schema:Blog, shouldn't we say that schema:blogPost there is a sub-property of our proposed schema:hasPart?

Makes sense to me.


On the editorial level, I just find the 'from' in the 'New Properties from Article' a bit confusing. I believe we advocate new properties 'for' Article, don't we?

I agree, I wish I could remember where I copied the ‘from’ from.

~Richard.

Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2014 20:30:09 UTC