Re: Proposing Article

+1, thanks Richard for pushing this and Happy New Year to every one!

On the mapping issue: I'm ok with acknowledgements and documenting mappings. I like Bibo, but I don't feel we have been utterly influenced by it (unless wrt. dropping some complex stuff at one point?). Also, I don't like the idea of discussing for ages on whether bibo:Document = schema:CreativeWork. I'd suggest to just ask Dan whether he thinks that foaf:Document = schema:CreativeWork ;-) (since bibo:Document = foaf:Document).

Also, while we propose a new super-class for schema:Blog, shouldn't we say that schema:blogPost there is a sub-property of our proposed schema:hasPart?

On the editorial level, I just find the 'from' in the 'New Properties from Article' a bit confusing. I believe we advocate new properties 'for' Article, don't we?

Best,

Antoine

On 1/14/14 12:51 PM, Wallis,Richard wrote:
> Hi and Happy New Year!
>
> A simple one to start the conversation in 2014.
>
> Can I have +/- 1’s for submitting the Article proposal <http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Article> to the public-vocabs list.
>
> The only change I would make is to it’s name which I think should be “Periodicals, Articles & Multi-volume Works”
>
> ~Richard
>

Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2014 22:27:22 UTC