Re: Proposing Article

I agree that it is a matter of interpretation, and that is because the 
DOI itself can be ambiguous.

kc

On 1/14/14, 6:48 AM, Wallis,Richard wrote:
> Good point.
>
> I suppose the schema:url property would be expected to be a link to the
> ‘thing’, whereas a doi url links you to a description of the article
> which is the sameAs the description we are building in our examples.
>
> I presume in some cases that the URI would be the same (for the article
> text and the description) in others it would be different. Personally I
> would lean towards using schema:sameAs in at least some of our examples.
>
> ~Richard
>
> On 14 Jan 2014, at 14:13, Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org
> <mailto:jyoung@oclc.org>> wrote:
>
>> It seems to me that the DOI should be schema:sameAs rather than
>> schema:url.
>> I notice that the schema:author/publisher/about are treated as text
>> strings sometimes and blank node typed entities in others. Perhaps
>> this was intentional?
>> Other than that, it looks good.
>> Jeff
>> *From:*Wallis,Richard [mailto:Richard.Wallis@oclc.org]
>> *Sent:*Tuesday, January 14, 2014 6:51 AM
>> *To:*public-schemabibex@w3.org <mailto:public-schemabibex@w3.org>
>> *Subject:*Proposing Article
>> Hi and Happy New Year!
>> A simple one to start the conversation in 2014.
>> Can I have +/- 1’s for submitting the Article proposal
>> <http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Article> to the
>> public-vocabs list.
>> The only change I would make is to it’s name which I think should be
>> “Periodicals, Articles & Multi-volume Works”
>> ~Richard
>

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet

Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2014 14:57:13 UTC