Great start Dan. As a test I have added a colour background to the status on the first three examples you worked on. I think it makes them stand out more - what do you think? ~Richard On 5 Feb 2014, at 05:01, Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com<mailto:denials@gmail.com>> wrote: On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Diane Hillmann <metadata.maven@gmail.com<mailto:metadata.maven@gmail.com>> wrote: As some who lived through the DCMI discussions on similar matters many moons ago (and the one whose experience sparked these discussions), I should point out that for a user, knowing that a document has been deprecated is only half the problem. The rest of it is "if this is a dead end, where should I be instead?". Thanks Diane! That was definitely the plan. All: I've hit a few of the pages at with status updates at the very top of the page. For example, https://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Article is a recommended proposal to public-vocabs; https://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Periodical is abandoned (with a pointer to Article); and https://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Holdings_via_Offer is a recommended best practice. I've tried to link to meeting minutes and the public-vocabs posts, where relevant, to provide context. I'll keep on working through the entries at https://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Special:AllPages over the next few days if no one else gets to them first :) Thanks, Dan
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2014 09:46:21 UTC