Re: Strategy for marking sections as "draft / abandoned / recommended by schemabibex / published at schema.org"?

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Diane Hillmann <metadata.maven@gmail.com>wrote:

> As some who lived through the DCMI discussions on similar matters many
> moons ago (and the one whose experience sparked these discussions), I
> should point out that for a user, knowing that a document has been
> deprecated is only half the problem. The rest of it is "if this is a dead
> end, where should I be instead?".
>

Thanks Diane! That was definitely the plan.

All: I've hit a few of the pages at with status updates at the very top of
the page. For example, https://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Article is
a recommended proposal to public-vocabs;
https://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Periodical is abandoned (with
a pointer to Article); and
https://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Holdings_via_Offer is a
recommended best practice. I've tried to link to meeting minutes and the
public-vocabs posts, where relevant, to provide context.

I'll keep on working through the entries at
https://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Special:AllPages over the
next few days if no one else gets to them first :)

Thanks,
Dan