Re: Strategy for marking sections as "draft / abandoned / recommended by schemabibex / published at schema.org"? from Dan Scott on 2014-02-05 (public-schemabibex@w3.org from February 2014)

From: Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 09:57:29 -0500
To: "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>
Cc: Diane Hillmann <metadata.maven@gmail.com>, Henry Andrews <hha1@cornell.edu>, "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAAY5AM34ZVCbGNJ6ytJf4zGb4U83+N3UsgzTu5e_eVYF3X-R7g@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>wrote:

>  Great start Dan.
>
>  As a test I have added a colour background to the status on the first
> three examples you worked on.  I think it makes them stand out more - what
> do you think?
>

Nice direction, Richard! I tweaked it a little bit so that the contrast
ratio between the text and the background wouldn't break accessibility
guidelines; now the colour comes in a box around the status line.

Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2014 14:57:57 UTC