- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 17:15:09 +0200
- To: <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
The round-up of sites sounds like a great idea, Karen! A. > Thanks, Antoine. I hadn't seen this. I note that they refer to "Work" and "Edition" which is also the terminology used by Open Library. (Plus they have "item" for individual books, like rare books.) I've begun a (hopefully short) round-up of bibliographic sites to see what levels of abstraction they use, and what they call them. This fits into that nicely. > > kc > > On 9/15/13 2:58 AM, Antoine Isaac wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> This may have been sent to the list before, but in case... >> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Books_task_force >> >> I believe this can be a quite useful reference in terms of use case. >> These are properties that somehow reflect user needs, it's likely that >> it would end expressed in schema.org one day. >> >> Would it be a task for this group to have a look at this schema, and >> flag any missing properties to schema.org? >> >> Note that it could also bring input for our 'work' debate. They have >> only two levels, work and edition. Apparently they regard the edition to >> be either the expression or manifestion (or both of them in fact), and >> the link between the edition and the work is simply 'edition of'. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Antoine >> >> >
Received on Sunday, 15 September 2013 15:15:35 UTC