- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 06:53:23 -0700
- To: public-schemabibex@w3.org
Thanks, Antoine. I hadn't seen this. I note that they refer to "Work" and "Edition" which is also the terminology used by Open Library. (Plus they have "item" for individual books, like rare books.) I've begun a (hopefully short) round-up of bibliographic sites to see what levels of abstraction they use, and what they call them. This fits into that nicely. kc On 9/15/13 2:58 AM, Antoine Isaac wrote: > Dear all, > > This may have been sent to the list before, but in case... > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Books_task_force > > I believe this can be a quite useful reference in terms of use case. > These are properties that somehow reflect user needs, it's likely that > it would end expressed in schema.org one day. > > Would it be a task for this group to have a look at this schema, and > flag any missing properties to schema.org? > > Note that it could also bring input for our 'work' debate. They have > only two levels, work and edition. Apparently they regard the edition to > be either the expression or manifestion (or both of them in fact), and > the link between the edition and the work is simply 'edition of'. > > Cheers, > > Antoine > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Received on Sunday, 15 September 2013 13:53:52 UTC