Re: Periodical relationships: continues / continuedAs properties?

On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is a good example of using these for descriptions of periodicals, but
> I'm sure they work for many kinds of creative works.

Right, that's why I was wondering about CreativeWork relationships :)

> I believe these two, albeit being somewhat more specific, are similar to
> <http://purl.org/dc/terms/replaces> and
> <http://purl.org/dc/terms/isReplacedBy>. So we should see if we can align
> with these. (Just like we should for the many other general relationships
> for creative works (as well as properties such as tableOfContents) in DC.)

Ooh, great catch!

> By the way: shouldn't [1] be replaced by [2]?

Maybe? [2] isn't linked from the vocab proposals page (or from
anywhere else in the wiki, actually), which is probably why I found
[1].

> Cheers,
> Niklas
>
> [1]: http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/CreativeWork_Relationships
> [2]:
> http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Schema_CreativeWork_Relationships
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> There is a reasonably common case for periodicals / serials where a
>> title change or publisher change necessitates the creation of a new
>> entity; for example, "Chemical Innovation" (published by the American
>> Chemical Society from 1971-1999) was previously published as
>> "Industrial & engineering chemistry" and continued publishing
>> thereafter as "Chemtech".
>>
>> I thought that the CreativeWork Relationships proposal [1] might have
>> covered this, but it focuses on "workExample" and "exampleOfWork"
>> which isn't a match.
>>
>> Do we feel a need for these properties at this time, either in the
>> Periodical proposal or the CreativeWork Relationships proposal?
>>
>> 1. http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/CreativeWork_Relationships
>>
>

Received on Thursday, 28 November 2013 17:20:33 UTC