Re: Periodical relationships: continues / continuedAs properties?

This is a good example of using these for descriptions of periodicals, but
I'm sure they work for many kinds of creative works.

I believe these two, albeit being somewhat more specific, are similar to <
http://purl.org/dc/terms/replaces> and <
http://purl.org/dc/terms/isReplacedBy>. So we should see if we can align
with these. (Just like we should for the many other general relationships
for creative works (as well as properties such as tableOfContents) in DC.)

By the way: shouldn't [1] be replaced by [2]?

Cheers,
Niklas

[1]: http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/CreativeWork_Relationships
[2]:
http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Schema_CreativeWork_Relationships



On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com> wrote:

> There is a reasonably common case for periodicals / serials where a
> title change or publisher change necessitates the creation of a new
> entity; for example, "Chemical Innovation" (published by the American
> Chemical Society from 1971-1999) was previously published as
> "Industrial & engineering chemistry" and continued publishing
> thereafter as "Chemtech".
>
> I thought that the CreativeWork Relationships proposal [1] might have
> covered this, but it focuses on "workExample" and "exampleOfWork"
> which isn't a match.
>
> Do we feel a need for these properties at this time, either in the
> Periodical proposal or the CreativeWork Relationships proposal?
>
> 1. http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/CreativeWork_Relationships
>
>