Re: Completing schema:article

I myself typically avoid assumptions on mailing lists, that's just me.

Dan has mentioned a few times that some things I mentioned, he had not seen
before or was not obvious.  That includes me, many things are not obvious
from my viewpoint working with Enterprises and their software woes.  Your
group has enlightened me on several use cases that have changed in scope
over the time when I used to work in a library setting !  I appreciate
everyone's knowledge sharing on this mailing list, even if I know some of
it or not.  My opinion is that we are all learners for life.

My only intent was information sharing in the discussion we are having,
rest assured.

Apologies for any upset, Karen, sincerely,


On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote:

>
>
> On 10/31/13 5:49 PM, Thad Guidry wrote:
>
>  I was thinking that your need was the Periodical wrapper first and then
>> all of those other sub-types that have some Periodicity to their
>> issuance would be under that Periodical.  You do know that you do not
>> have to be absolutely explicit with schema.org <http://schema.org>
>>
>> types, right ? ... you can just start and define the basic types you
>> really need...pulling in properties from any of the included parent
>> types as needed.
>>
>
>
> Gee, really?! Thad, have you been out of town or something? Do you assume
> that I don't know the basics of what I am working on? Could that have
> something to do with.... oh, forget about it.
>
> kc
>
>
>
>
>>
>> --
>> -Thad
>> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+**ThadGuidry<https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
>> >
>> Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/**thadguidry/<http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>
>> >
>>
>
> --
> Karen Coyle
> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
> m: 1-510-435-8234
> skype: kcoylenet
>



-- 
-Thad
+ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>