- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 07:00:18 -0700
- To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- CC: Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com>, "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
On 10/31/13 5:49 PM, Thad Guidry wrote: > I was thinking that your need was the Periodical wrapper first and then > all of those other sub-types that have some Periodicity to their > issuance would be under that Periodical. You do know that you do not > have to be absolutely explicit with schema.org <http://schema.org> > types, right ? ... you can just start and define the basic types you > really need...pulling in properties from any of the included parent > types as needed. Gee, really?! Thad, have you been out of town or something? Do you assume that I don't know the basics of what I am working on? Could that have something to do with.... oh, forget about it. kc > > > -- > -Thad > +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry> > Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/> -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Received on Friday, 1 November 2013 14:00:46 UTC