RE: Some Draft SchemaBibEx Proposals

Richard

 

In the Identifier proposal, the value of the schema.identifier property
includes URIs.

 

1. Assuming that schema.org Type is a synonym for RDF Class (or am I
wrong?), what does this mean for the range of the identifier? Is it a
literal, as in the "urn:nbn:ch:bel-9039" example, or a class, as in the
<examplelib.org/identifier/12345> example, which is an individual member of
the class?

 

2. Using the example, is it not true to say in ttl:

 

<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/38264520> schema.identifier
<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/38264520> .?

 

If so, <http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/38264520> is both a schema.Book and a
schema.Identifier .

 

Cheers

 

Gordon

 

From: Richard Wallis [mailto:richard.wallis@oclc.org] 
Sent: 03 January 2013 12:36
To: public-schemabibex@w3.org
Cc: Young,Jeff (OR); Vizine-Goetz,Diane
Subject: Some Draft SchemaBibEx Proposals

 

Hi all,

I have pulled some of our thoughts and discussions together into a couple of
draft vocabulary proposals.  They can be found on the Wiki here:
<http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Vocabulary_Proposals>.

These are most definitely 'draft' proposals and are there as a foundation
for us to work on. 

I am not precious about any of the Type or Property names I have used, or
any of the descriptive text either.  If you have better suggestions, dive in
and share!

I have included some example RDF - I will add some RDFa and possibly other
format examples later.  I am holding off for a few days on this, as I am in
discussion with the W3C hosting people about adding a syntax highlighting
extension added to the Wiki which will make code examples far more readable.

Regards,
     Richard.