Re: "citation" property needed on ScholarlyArticle

Hi Alf,

I haven't looked at your mark-up examples yet, but I note that the
Schema.org documentation has this note "Candidate for promotion to
ScholarlyArticle" on citation in MedicalScholarlyArticle
<http://schema.org/MedicalScholarlyArticle>.

Our approach could be to just support that.

The question I have is - is it only scholarly articles that can cite other
creative works?  What about books, blogs, etc.  Maybe the property could be
best promoted to CreativeWork.
 
Thoughts anyone.

~Richard.


On 13/02/2013 09:16, "Alf Eaton" <eaton.alf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Done: http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Citation
> 
> I'm still not quite sure how the combination of itemref + itemscope
> works in practise, so the example might need some tweaking.
> 
> Alf
> 
> On 12 February 2013 23:09, Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@oclc.org> wrote:
>> Hi Alf,
>> 
>> Create a proposal on the group wiki.
>> 
>> If you follow the pattern of other potential proposals on the Wiki
>> <http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Vocabulary_Proposals>  -
>> commonEndeavor is a good template to follow, as that also proposes the
>> addition of a single property to an existing Schema type.
>> 
>> If the consensus of the group is in agreement we can propose it with all the
>> other that we agree upon in the next few months.
>> 
>> ~Richard.
>> 
>> 
>> On 12/02/2013 17:18, "Alf Eaton" <eaton.alf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> In the current <http://schema.org/MedicalScholarlyArticle> model, the
>>> property "citation" is marked as a candidate for promotion up to
>>> <http://schema.org/ScholarlyArticle>.
>>> 
>>> This seems perfectly reasonable, and I'd like to be able to make use of it.
>>> 
>>> How do we go about getting the schema altered to that the "citation"
>>> property is also available on <http://schema.org/ScholarlyArticle>?
>>> 
>>> Alf
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2013 10:19:57 UTC