- From: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 05:18:02 -0500
- To: Alf Eaton <eaton.alf@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
+1 of support from me for promoting citation from MedicalScholarlyArticle to ScholarlyArticle. I think you could probably push it even further up to Article, and also adding it to Book. Unfortunately, I suspect it doesn't belong in CreativeWork, since paintings, diets and software don't typically cite things. But maybe I'm not squinting correctly :-) Alf, I haven't seen itemref and itemid used this way before. Reading the HTML 5 doc on this [1] makes me think that the id property should be used instead. So instead of your bibliography having: <div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ScholarlyArticle" itemid="ref-1"> you would have: <div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ScholarlyArticle" id="ref-1"> Or am I misreading the microdata spec? //Ed [1] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/microdata.html On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 4:16 AM, Alf Eaton <eaton.alf@gmail.com> wrote: > Done: http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Citation > > I'm still not quite sure how the combination of itemref + itemscope > works in practise, so the example might need some tweaking. > > Alf > > On 12 February 2013 23:09, Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@oclc.org> wrote: >> Hi Alf, >> >> Create a proposal on the group wiki. >> >> If you follow the pattern of other potential proposals on the Wiki >> <http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Vocabulary_Proposals> - >> commonEndeavor is a good template to follow, as that also proposes the >> addition of a single property to an existing Schema type. >> >> If the consensus of the group is in agreement we can propose it with all the >> other that we agree upon in the next few months. >> >> ~Richard. >> >> >> On 12/02/2013 17:18, "Alf Eaton" <eaton.alf@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> In the current <http://schema.org/MedicalScholarlyArticle> model, the >>> property "citation" is marked as a candidate for promotion up to >>> <http://schema.org/ScholarlyArticle>. >>> >>> This seems perfectly reasonable, and I'd like to be able to make use of it. >>> >>> How do we go about getting the schema altered to that the "citation" >>> property is also available on <http://schema.org/ScholarlyArticle>? >>> >>> Alf >>> >>> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2013 10:18:29 UTC