Re: Examples Re: Modelling Course and CourseOffering

Is there a way to validate this schema with Protege?

The RDFa for modeling is a bit of a stumbling block.

I feel like we could brainstorm classes and properties in focused modeling
activities and then use existing tools and defined standards to accomplish
similar objectives.

... Protege

Protégé⬅ <https://wrdrd.com/docs/consulting/knowledge-engineering#protege>
Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protégé_(software)
Homepage: http://protege.stanford.edu/
Homepage: http://webprotege.stanford.edu/

Protégé is a knowledge management software application with support for RDF
<https://wrdrd.com/docs/consulting/knowledge-engineering#rdf>, OWL
<https://wrdrd.com/docs/consulting/knowledge-engineering#owl>, and a few
different reasoners.

Web Protégé is a web-based version of Protégé with many similar features.

Protégé is a Free and Open Source software tool.



Will it ever be in scope for the Schema.org project to develop a system(s)
for collaborative namespace/ontology development? (Will the
schemaorg/schemaorg app ever require write access?)

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Richard Wallis <rjw@dataliberate.com>
wrote:

> Yes - ideally all three
>
> ~Richard
>
>
> > On 16 Feb 2016, at 13:40, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 16 February 2016 at 13:24, Phil Barker <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk> wrote:
> >> Thanks Richard.
> >>
> >> On 16/02/2016 12:47, Richard Wallis wrote:
> >>
> >> Great start Phil,
> >>
> >> I had a play with the first example, expanding it a bit - the N3 less
> the
> >> prefixes below.
> >>
> >> Not wishing to make the mail trail unreadable, I think we should move
> the
> >> examples onto the wiki.
> >>
> >> Agree (or possibly github?), but I am going to be away for a few days
> >> starting this afternoon, so it'll have to wait.
> >
> > Can I put in a vote for JSON-LD or Microdata/RDFa in those examples;
> > I'm afraid Turtle/N3 remains a relatively esoteric skill, and it would
> > be good to keep examples close to the form that will be in eventual
> > use in the wider Web (and on schema.org).
> >
> > Dan
>
>
>

Received on Saturday, 20 February 2016 03:24:52 UTC