- From: Wes Turner <wes.turner@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 21:24:23 -0600
- To: Richard Wallis <rjw@dataliberate.com>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, Phil Barker <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk>, Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>, public-schema-course-extend@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CACfEFw85ekkpX7Hig7ir_5dX0c5DPan7BMQ9y1_sCfNYFWXiRg@mail.gmail.com>
Is there a way to validate this schema with Protege? The RDFa for modeling is a bit of a stumbling block. I feel like we could brainstorm classes and properties in focused modeling activities and then use existing tools and defined standards to accomplish similar objectives. ... Protege Protégé⬅ <https://wrdrd.com/docs/consulting/knowledge-engineering#protege> Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protégé_(software) Homepage: http://protege.stanford.edu/ Homepage: http://webprotege.stanford.edu/ Protégé is a knowledge management software application with support for RDF <https://wrdrd.com/docs/consulting/knowledge-engineering#rdf>, OWL <https://wrdrd.com/docs/consulting/knowledge-engineering#owl>, and a few different reasoners. Web Protégé is a web-based version of Protégé with many similar features. Protégé is a Free and Open Source software tool. Will it ever be in scope for the Schema.org project to develop a system(s) for collaborative namespace/ontology development? (Will the schemaorg/schemaorg app ever require write access?) On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Richard Wallis <rjw@dataliberate.com> wrote: > Yes - ideally all three > > ~Richard > > > > On 16 Feb 2016, at 13:40, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: > > > >> On 16 February 2016 at 13:24, Phil Barker <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk> wrote: > >> Thanks Richard. > >> > >> On 16/02/2016 12:47, Richard Wallis wrote: > >> > >> Great start Phil, > >> > >> I had a play with the first example, expanding it a bit - the N3 less > the > >> prefixes below. > >> > >> Not wishing to make the mail trail unreadable, I think we should move > the > >> examples onto the wiki. > >> > >> Agree (or possibly github?), but I am going to be away for a few days > >> starting this afternoon, so it'll have to wait. > > > > Can I put in a vote for JSON-LD or Microdata/RDFa in those examples; > > I'm afraid Turtle/N3 remains a relatively esoteric skill, and it would > > be good to keep examples close to the form that will be in eventual > > use in the wider Web (and on schema.org). > > > > Dan > > >
Received on Saturday, 20 February 2016 03:24:52 UTC