- From: Phil Barker <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 20:51:22 +0000
- To: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
- CC: Stuart Sutton <sasutton@dublincore.net>, "public-schema-course-extend@w3.org" <public-schema-course-extend@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <55C7F9FD-3CE0-426E-BEA7-8E2535CBA1BB@hw.ac.uk>
Yes please! -- Phil Barker. . . @philbarker. LRMI, Cetis, ICBL Heriot-Watt University http://people.pjjk.net/phil Sent from my phone so I probably couldn't see half of what I wrote. On February 5, 2016 7:54:12 PM GMT, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com> wrote: >I have been working through some use cases for degree programs. Would >it be >useful for me to share what I have drafted so far? > >- Vicki > >Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com > > >On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Phil Barker <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk> >wrote: > >> >> >> On 03/02/16 13:31, Stuart Sutton wrote: >> >> Phil, one question regarding the scope and definition. There has been >> discussion of the notion of program/course of study (variously >named...even >> called simply course). The scope can be inferred to include >description of >> programs of study from: (1) the definition, "An educational course is >> defined as a sequence of events and/or creative works which aims to >build >> knowledge, competency and ability of learners" and (2) Use Case #8 >(set of >> courses); and (3) from several of the examples (physics at U of >Bristol) >> and the program of study in Dental Assisting (and associated course). >> >> Personally, I'd like to see the scope inclusion of both course and >> program/course of study made explicit as opposed to being inferred, >and, as >> a result, subject to speculation and debate. >> >> Yes, now is the time to debate whether tracks/programs are in scope. >If >> they are that should be explicit >> >> Like you I think they should be. >> >> Whether we need a distinct type for programmes or whether having a >course >> which includes courses is sensible or sufficient is something we >should >> discuss later. >> >> Phil >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:36 AM, Phil Barker <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk> >wrote: >> >>> >>> OK, thanks for the feedback. No one said that they objected to using >the >>> outline use cases as a starting point for discussion, so that is >what we >>> will do. >>> >>> I hope we can deal with most of the use cases as separate issues, >with a >>> short discussion thread about each one leading to a worked example >of how >>> the proposal would deal with it. I'll start a tracking issue in >Github >>> which mirrors these use cases and some of the bigger picture issues >(e.g. >>> is a course a creative work or an intangible, do we need Course and >>> CourseOffering as separate types) to keep a liaison point with the >main >>> schema.org activity. I also want to check that there is nothing >missing, >>> and that the basic scope is agreed. SO: >>> >>> *Question: *looking at the use cases, scope description and >definition >>> of an educational course, does anyone want to suggest any changes, >>> additions, deletions... >>> >>> Scope and definition are here: >>> <https://www.w3.org/community/schema-course-extend/wiki/Main_Page> >>> https://www.w3.org/community/schema-course-extend/wiki/Main_Page >>> Outline use cases here: >>> >https://www.w3.org/community/schema-course-extend/wiki/Outline_use_cases >>> >>> I have "retired" the google doc: you can view but not edit it, and >there >>> is link pointing people from there to the wiki. >>> >>> Phil >>> >>> On 29/01/16 09:53, Richard Wallis wrote: >>> >>> +1 for the W3C Wiki. >>> >>> Not only will it help discussion and examples, but it can become an >>> easily discovered source of practice and background that can remain >well >>> after any extension(s) are adopted. >>> >>> ~Richard. >>> >>> Richard Wallis >>> Founder, Data Liberate >>> http://dataliberate.com >>> Linkedin: <http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis> >>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis> >>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis >>> Twitter: @rjw >>> >>> On 29 January 2016 at 09:49, Miquel Centelles < ><mcentellesv@gmail.com> >>> mcentellesv@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello all, >>>> >>>> I'd prefer the W3C group wiki. >>>> >>>> Miquel Centelles >>>> >>>> 2016-01-28 15:05 GMT+01:00 Phil Barker < <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk> >>>> phil.barker@hw.ac.uk>: >>>> >>>>> Hello all >>>>> In our kick-off meeting Dan proposed that we use the Schema for >Courses >>>>> [ <https://goo.gl/DnTTsb>https://goo.gl/DnTTsb] document with use >case >>>>> sketches to identify what we wanted the schema course extension to >cover. >>>>> >>>>> I offered to simplify this a little and put it on the Community >Group >>>>> wiki, which I have done, see: >>>>> >https://www.w3.org/community/schema-course-extend/wiki/Outline_use_cases >>>>> >>>>> The idea is that these outline use cases would describe what we >want >>>>> the proposal to cover. We would be able to provide an example, >based >>>>> (ideally) on data from a real website, of how the proposal >provided markup >>>>> for the information required for that use case. >>>>> >>>>> *Question:* does anyone object to this approach? If so please let >us >>>>> know in the next few days. >>>>> >>>>> If no one objects to the overall approach, we might want to >discuss >>>>> some use cases (including suggesting additions) in more detail. I >think for >>>>> most of them it should be pretty straightforward to show how >current >>>>> proposals meet them. >>>>> >>>>> *Question:* We have a choice between W3C group wiki and google >docs >>>>> for working docs. I don't want to have a document live on both. >Which do >>>>> you prefer? >>>>> >>>>> Phil >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Phil Barker @philbarker >>>>> LRMI, Cetis, ICBL http://people.pjjk.net/phil >>>>> Heriot-Watt University >>>>> >>>>> Workflow: http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/~philb/workflow/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> We invite research leaders and ambitious early career researchers >to >>>>> join us in leading and driving research in key inter-disciplinary >themes. >>>>> Please see <http://www.hw.ac.uk/researchleaders> >>>>> www.hw.ac.uk/researchleaders for further information and how to >apply. >>>>> >>>>> Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity registered under >charity >>>>> number SC000278. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Aquest correu electrònic i els annexos poden contenir informació >>>>> confidencial o protegida legalment i està adreçat exclusivament a >la >>>>> persona o entitat destinatària. Si no sou el destinatari final o >la persona >>>>> encarregada de rebre’l, no esteu autoritzat a llegir-lo, >retenir-lo, >>>>> modificar-lo, distribuir-lo, copiar-lo ni a revelar-ne el >contingut. Si heu >>>>> rebut aquest correu electrònic per error, us preguem que >n’informeu al >>>>> remitent i que elimineu del sistema el missatge i el material >annex que >>>>> pugui contenir. Gràcies per la vostra col·laboració. >>>>> >>>>> Este correo electrónico y sus anexos pueden contener información >>>>> confidencial o legalmente protegida y está exclusivamente dirigido >a la >>>>> persona o entidad destinataria. Si usted no es el destinatario >final o la >>>>> persona encargada de recibirlo, no está autorizado a leerlo, >retenerlo, >>>>> modificarlo, distribuirlo, copiarlo ni a revelar su contenido. Si >ha >>>>> recibido este mensaje electrónico por error, le rogamos que >informe al >>>>> remitente y elimine del sistema el mensaje y el material anexo que >pueda >>>>> contener. Gracias por su colaboración. >>>>> >>>>> This email message and any documents attached to it may contain >>>>> confidential or legally protected material and are intended solely >for the >>>>> use of the individual or organization to whom they are addressed. >We remind >>>>> you that if you are not the intended recipient of this email >message or the >>>>> person responsible for processing it, then you are not authorized >to read, >>>>> save, modify, send, copy or disclose any of its contents. If you >have >>>>> received this email message by mistake, we kindly ask you to >inform the >>>>> sender of this and to eliminate both the message and any >attachments it >>>>> carries from your account. Thank you for your collaboration. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Miquel Centelles >>>> Facultat de Biblioteconomia i Documentació >>>> Universitat de Barcelona >>>> Melcior de Palau, 140 >>>> Despatx 203 >>>> 08014 Barcelona >>>> Tel.: 93 40 34017 - Fax: 934 035 772 >>>> Skype: miquel.centelles >>>> Correu electrònic: <miquel.centelles@ub.edu>miquel.centelles@ub.edu >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> -- >>> Phil Barker @philbarker >>> LRMI, Cetis, ICBL http://people.pjjk.net/phil >>> Heriot-Watt University >>> >>> Ubuntu: http://xkcd.com/456/ >>> not so much an operating system as a learning opportunity. >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> -- >> Phil Barker @philbarker >> LRMI, Cetis, ICBL http://people.pjjk.net/phil >> Heriot-Watt University >> >> Ubuntu: http://xkcd.com/456/ >> not so much an operating system as a learning opportunity. >> >>
Received on Friday, 5 February 2016 20:52:08 UTC