Re: schema course extend: accessibility

+1

~Richard

Richard Wallis
Founder, Data Liberate
http://dataliberate.com
Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis
Twitter: @rjw

On 18 August 2016 at 15:30, Phil Barker <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk> wrote:

> Hello again, I propose that we do not address accessibility requirements
> as part of the course extension (we can use properties inherited from more
> general accessibility work).
>
>
> We have  use cases relating to accessibility at
> https://www.w3.org/community/schema-course-extend/wiki/Outline_use_cases
>
> namely that it should be possible to find course where the searcher is
> concerned about physical and cognitive accessibility features, controls,
> API, hazards.
>
> This leads to requirements around identifyingaccessibility features,
> controls, API, hazards of resources (i.e. CreativeWorks) used in delivering
> the course, in any Events that are part of the course and at any locations
> where the events are held.
>
> There are other people with specialist knowledge for accessibility who
> have dealt with the accessibility of CreativeWorks (so we can just apply
> that to Course and to any materials used in the course), and there is an
> open issue relating to accessibility of Places (and hence events at those
> places), https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/254
>
> So, are we happy to leave accessibility to the accessibility people and
> use the outputs of their work for Course and CourseInstance as they are
> inherited from CreativeWork, Event etc.?
>
> Phil
>
>
> --
> Phil Barker           @philbarker
> LRMI, Cetis, ICBL     http://people.pjjk.net/phil
> Heriot-Watt University
>
> Workflow: http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/~philb/workflow/
>
>
>