Re: Unvaccinated people?

*penultimate => *ultimate

On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 2:07 PM Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I've heard about things being absolutely nuts in Melbourne. It is
> important to think about the ramifications of misapplication of technology
> in this kind of environment. The W3C as I know is not a law making body.
> However, I suppose best practices could be encouraged? The closest that I
> can think of is web accessibility. IMO, we used to have a critical mass of
> people fearing God* that things did not get out of control.
>
> *Belief there is some sort of penultimate authority that will ultimately
> hold us accountable, and works for a good outcome if in alignment,
> regardless of personal or organizational resources.
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 1:53 PM Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> An elderly lady on the radio last night. Double 💉💉 is afraid of going
>> to the supermarket because of un-jabbed people. She also said that the
>> unvaccinated should be eliminated🤦🏻‍♂️ I kid you not.
>> Source: https://twitter.com/armyveteran13/status/1441158879564341252?s=19
>>
>> I grew up in a medical family, pathology.
>> Par of what is now:
>> https://www.google.com/search?q=asx:shl
>>
>> The wealth taught me lots as a kid.
>>
>> Part of how I started my works from 2000 leading me here, and my comments
>> https://soundcloud.com/ubiquitous-au/credentialscgtelecon2015-06-02medical
>>
>> When seeking to figure out an "identity ecosystem" that served human
>> beings, noting, works on things like lowstakes usecases such as tv (HbbTV)
>> during the 00's (before I got involved here, or knew much about it).
>>
>> Who else thinks unvaccinated persons (regardless of the drugs? Or
>> whatever) should be eliminated?
>>
>> It's interesting as the work started here (inc. WebID & web-payments)
>> then led to protests, but people are very quiet like, it doesn't matter?
>> It matters to me...
>>
>> As far as I can tell, the work I was involved with, with others, doesn't
>> support the means for people to take facts to a court to seek support of
>> human rights....? I guess it wasn't a W3C usecase. But does the non English
>> speaking world care about excuses?
>>
>> After an assult,
>>
>> https://github.com/WebCivics/ontologies intentionally made a hackjob of
>> the UDhr and other human rights charters and related things, to see what
>> was done.
>>
>> Afaik, nothing.  By all means point me to the ontology. It would be great
>> to employ, ATM.
>>
>> We talk about RWW like it's a right for people to contribute and be heard
>> via www.
>>
>> Yet...  Is this just a place of harvest...?
>>
>> IDK.
>>
>> I pointed out to the Twitter:
>> @jack led group links (inc. archive.org links for the videos that
>> remarkably still work that way) for old work, that I used, that worked.
>> Back then.
>>
>> Is the problem not one of economics?
>>
>> I don't understand human depravity, as a business model.  I'm surprised
>> W3C members do, indeed, I don't understand.
>>
>> Timothy Holborn.
>>
>