Re: Unvaccinated people?

I've heard about things being absolutely nuts in Melbourne. It is important
to think about the ramifications of misapplication of technology in this
kind of environment. The W3C as I know is not a law making body. However, I
suppose best practices could be encouraged? The closest that I can think of
is web accessibility. IMO, we used to have a critical mass of people
fearing God* that things did not get out of control.

*Belief there is some sort of penultimate authority that will ultimately
hold us accountable, and works for a good outcome if in alignment,
regardless of personal or organizational resources.

On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 1:53 PM Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
wrote:

> An elderly lady on the radio last night. Double 💉💉 is afraid of going to
> the supermarket because of un-jabbed people. She also said that the
> unvaccinated should be eliminated🤦🏻‍♂️ I kid you not.
> Source: https://twitter.com/armyveteran13/status/1441158879564341252?s=19
>
> I grew up in a medical family, pathology.
> Par of what is now:
> https://www.google.com/search?q=asx:shl
>
> The wealth taught me lots as a kid.
>
> Part of how I started my works from 2000 leading me here, and my comments
> https://soundcloud.com/ubiquitous-au/credentialscgtelecon2015-06-02medical
>
> When seeking to figure out an "identity ecosystem" that served human
> beings, noting, works on things like lowstakes usecases such as tv (HbbTV)
> during the 00's (before I got involved here, or knew much about it).
>
> Who else thinks unvaccinated persons (regardless of the drugs? Or
> whatever) should be eliminated?
>
> It's interesting as the work started here (inc. WebID & web-payments) then
> led to protests, but people are very quiet like, it doesn't matter?  It
> matters to me...
>
> As far as I can tell, the work I was involved with, with others, doesn't
> support the means for people to take facts to a court to seek support of
> human rights....? I guess it wasn't a W3C usecase. But does the non English
> speaking world care about excuses?
>
> After an assult,
>
> https://github.com/WebCivics/ontologies intentionally made a hackjob of
> the UDhr and other human rights charters and related things, to see what
> was done.
>
> Afaik, nothing.  By all means point me to the ontology. It would be great
> to employ, ATM.
>
> We talk about RWW like it's a right for people to contribute and be heard
> via www.
>
> Yet...  Is this just a place of harvest...?
>
> IDK.
>
> I pointed out to the Twitter:
> @jack led group links (inc. archive.org links for the videos that
> remarkably still work that way) for old work, that I used, that worked.
> Back then.
>
> Is the problem not one of economics?
>
> I don't understand human depravity, as a business model.  I'm surprised
> W3C members do, indeed, I don't understand.
>
> Timothy Holborn.
>