Human Experience policy - re: usecases

Hi Jeff,

with great admiration...

I was chatting through some emotional considerations; linked to my 'lived
experiences' and in-turn, how she has spent, perhaps more than ten
thousand, in helping me (us) progress...

Therein - legal personalities do not have 'personal' and 'lived
experiences' in the same way as 'data subjects', human kind...  SO, without
that input; the means to define solutions, ends-up being kinda
distorted...  The means to 'make-up' usecases, are different to 'lived
experiences', and how future work may progress solutions to ensure 'bad'
and/or 'unlawful' (as a subjective concept) do not happen in future; via
information systems design protocols.

How does or can W3C Define a protocol to balance the various considerations
balancing the needs of expression, privacy, dignity and the need for inputs
for ICT designs?

I hoped you might have some input that could better serve the needs of
those i've cared for, cared about; and seek systemic means to support
available remedy, unavailable in past, but capably available in future;
dependent upon the ideology - of 'importance'...

the 'consciousness' sciences[1] have a material physics based role in how
the answer is actually defined; but moreover, i am assuming, your role is
to help figure out the ideological predeterminate that is intended to be
compliant with the derivatives of future science. (or harbour the
liability, should that be found, to not be the case, et.al.);...

Timothy Holborn.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCbmz0VSZ_voTpRK9-o5RksERak4kOL40