Re: Coherent (modern) definition of RWW

On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 18:21, Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> wrote:

> Quoting Melvin Carvalho (2021-05-19 17:06:32)
> > We have some links in our wiki:
> >
> > https://www.w3.org/community/rww/wiki/ReadWrite_Protocols
> >
> > Although there is some link rot and some of it has not been updated in
> > many years.  But, well, it's a wiki, so feel free to change it.
>
> Good point - done now:
> https://www.w3.org/community/rww/wiki/ReadWrite_Protocols#Atomic_Data


Brilliant, thanks alot!


>
>
>
> > This article, tho over 10 years old, is part of the motivation of the
> > group.  I think it has aged quite well
> >
> > https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/ReadWriteLinkedData.html
> >
> > In particular noting:
> >
> > "Outstanding issues This article does not deal with the database-like
> > storage APIs and specifically with atomic transactions, or
> > fine-grained access control."
> >
> > Since then, web access control has been developed in this group to be
> > usable.  Not sure about atomic transactions, tho it is in some part
> > related to time.  The new thing now is (byzantine) fault tolerance,
> > too ...
>
> Here's the documentation for byzantine fault tolerant atomic
> transactions for Atomic Data:
> https://docs.atomicdata.dev/commits/compare.html#atomic-commits


This is a really nice page!


>
>
>
>  - Jonas
>
> --
>  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
>  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
>
>  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private