Re: Coherent (modern) definition of RWW

Quoting Melvin Carvalho (2021-05-19 17:06:32)
> We have some links in our wiki:
> 
> https://www.w3.org/community/rww/wiki/ReadWrite_Protocols
> 
> Although there is some link rot and some of it has not been updated in 
> many years.  But, well, it's a wiki, so feel free to change it.

Good point - done now: 
https://www.w3.org/community/rww/wiki/ReadWrite_Protocols#Atomic_Data


> This article, tho over 10 years old, is part of the motivation of the 
> group.  I think it has aged quite well
> 
> https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/ReadWriteLinkedData.html
> 
> In particular noting:
> 
> "Outstanding issues This article does not deal with the database-like 
> storage APIs and specifically with atomic transactions, or 
> fine-grained access control."
> 
> Since then, web access control has been developed in this group to be 
> usable.  Not sure about atomic transactions, tho it is in some part 
> related to time.  The new thing now is (byzantine) fault tolerance, 
> too ...

Here's the documentation for byzantine fault tolerant atomic 
transactions for Atomic Data: 
https://docs.atomicdata.dev/commits/compare.html#atomic-commits


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Received on Wednesday, 19 May 2021 16:22:31 UTC