Quoting Nathan Rixham (2021-05-19 14:37:51) > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 1:20 PM Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> wrote: > > > Quoting Melvin Carvalho (2021-05-19 13:14:37) > > > On Tue, 18 May 2021 at 21:33, Kingsley Idehen > > > <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > > > > The Super Set should always be the point of focus if > > > > interoperability is the goal. That's a classic route to more > > > > "AND" and less "OR" . > > > > > > +100 to this > > > ... > > > We should be inclusive of the many thousands (millions?) of > > > developers that enjoy working with JSON(-LD) > > > > > > And also introduce them to the benefits of a more structures EAV > > > model ie making merges cheap, enabling federation, allowing anyone > > > to say anything about anything (ie decentralized features), > > > discovery, follow your nose, indexing, allowing multiple things to > > > exist in a document. > > > > > > And we can also learn from the tooling and network around JSON, > > > how it makes parsing easy and ubiquitous, fast startup time, easy > > > to work with arrays, easy to work with numbers > > > > Related to the above, Atomic Data seems an interesting concrete > > approach to use a subset of RDF optimized for lesser confusion for > > non-RDF developers: https://docs.atomicdata.dev/motivation.html > > > Very nice, when multiple parties independently create the same thing, > for years on end, then it's reasonable to assert they're on the right > path, and encountering the same issues w/ the same clear solution. Are you saying that others have invented something similar to Atomic Data? I'd be quite interested in learning more about that. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Received on Wednesday, 19 May 2021 13:03:17 UTC