On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 1:20 PM Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> wrote: > Quoting Melvin Carvalho (2021-05-19 13:14:37) > > On Tue, 18 May 2021 at 21:33, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> > > wrote: > > > The Super Set should always be the point of focus if > > > interoperability is the goal. That's a classic route to more "AND" > > > and less "OR" . > > > > +100 to this > > ... > > We should be inclusive of the many thousands (millions?) of developers > > that enjoy working with JSON(-LD) > > > > And also introduce them to the benefits of a more structures EAV model > > ie making merges cheap, enabling federation, allowing anyone to say > > anything about anything (ie decentralized features), discovery, follow > > your nose, indexing, allowing multiple things to exist in a document. > > > > And we can also learn from the tooling and network around JSON, how it > > makes parsing easy and ubiquitous, fast startup time, easy to work > > with arrays, easy to work with numbers > > Related to the above, Atomic Data seems an interesting concrete approach > to use a subset of RDF optimized for lesser confusion for non-RDF > developers: https://docs.atomicdata.dev/motivation.html Very nice, when multiple parties independently create the same thing, for years on end, then it's reasonable to assert they're on the right path, and encountering the same issues w/ the same clear solution.
Received on Wednesday, 19 May 2021 12:39:32 UTC