- From: Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk>
- Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 16:27:32 +0200
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, public-rww@w3.org
- Message-ID: <162126165292.723826.12615714421407396362@auryn.jones.dk>
Quoting Kingsley Idehen (2021-05-17 15:39:52) > On 5/17/21 8:44 AM, Timothy Holborn wrote: > > The concept of RWW started a long time ago. > > > Yes, it is as old as the World Wide Web (Web) itself. > > Question posed is; > > > > What's the modern (well referenced) definition? (Incremental growth > > of past "definitions, etc. Perhaps therein also, better clarity of > > previously assumed characteristics / constituencies, etc.) > > > A Read-Write Web is a hyperlink-based network that offers both read > and write capabilities to its users. Nothing has changed, bar > increased murkiness surrounding: > > 1. Identity > 2. Identification > 3. Authentication > 4. Authorization > 5. Storage As I understand it, some of the hype around blockchain is that it addresses some of the above - and some the criticism is that it does not address all of them (other criticism is that price is too high). Same/similar for Holochain and IPFS. I dearly hope that the Safe Network succeeds and reaches critical mass, as it seems to me that it addresses all of the above 5 points, with a cost directly tied to the operations themselves (the Safenet equivalent of bitcoin "mining" is to contribute storage or bandwidth or validation to the network): https://safenetwork.tech/faq/#what-is-the-safe-network - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Received on Monday, 17 May 2021 14:28:03 UTC