- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:52:05 +0200
- To: business-of-linked-data-bold <business-of-linked-data-bold@googlegroups.com>
- Cc: "public-rww@w3.org" <public-rww@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhLVYRBdfcYpyLExuurC=f7ULRFGcChi3f9iGbU2MOErwA@mail.gmail.com>
On 24 August 2016 at 04:17, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > On 8/23/16 6:56 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > > > > On 24 August 2016 at 00:28, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> > wrote: > >> On 8/23/16 5:36 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: >> >> yes, i was able to create a file, nice! >> >> On 23 August 2016 at 20:43, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 8/23/16 2:25 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 22 August 2016 at 14:49, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 8/22/16 4:34 AM, Timothy Holborn wrote: >>>> >>>> Kingsley, >>>> >>>> Most of the interesting open data related platforms plug into Virtuoso. >>>> >>>> >>>> They support open standards. Virtuoso supports open standards. >>>> >>>> >>>> I think you need to step it up a bit, and am happy to help, but am >>>> unsure of the best way to go about it. >>>> >>>> >>>> I am totally unsure of what Virtuoso has to add to this matter. >>>> >>>> >>>> If SoLiD is Virtuoso compatible, I think the answer is bit of a >>>> no-brainer. Question remains one of business systems, rather than >>>> exclusively Tech. >>>> >>>> >>>> Virtuoso supports all the open standards covered by SoLiD, and some >>>> (e.g., WebID+TLS+Delegation). >>>> >>>> We need to speak clearly about these issues otherwise we have nothing >>>> but confusion. >>>> >>> >>> What will be really amazing is when Solid apps are tested to run on an >>> openlink backend and vice versa. >>>  >>> >>> Melvin, >>> >>> So why don't I share a folder endpoint [1] and the you try to use SoLiD >>> to create a document in that folder? Naturally, I would need to grant >>> access to you via your WebID (which I assume to be: >>> https://melvincarvalho.com/#me) . >>> >>> Links: >>> >>> [1] http://kingsley.idehen.net/DAV/home/kidehen/Public/solid/ >>> [2] https://kingsley.idehen.net/DAV/home/kidehen/Public/solid/ >>> [3] http://kingsley.idehen.net/DAV/home/kidehen/Public/solid%2Cacl -- >>> ACL doc (your webid has access to this too!) >>> [4] https://linkeddata.uriburner.com/rdf-editor -- Editor that can be >>> used to compare experience re. creation of document in the sample/qa >>> folder. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> >>> Kingsley Idehen >>> Founder & CEO >>> OpenLink Software (Home Page: http://www.openlinksw.com) >>> >>> Medium Blog: https://medium.com/@kidehen >>> Blogspot Blog: http://kidehen.blogspot.com >>> Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen >>> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about >>> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen >>> Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Business Of Linked Data (BOLD)" group. To unsubscribe from this >>> group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to >>> business-of-linked-data-bold+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more >>> options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Business Of Linked Data (BOLD)" group. To unsubscribe from this >> group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to >> business-of-linked-data-bold+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more >> options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> Melvin, >> >> Does that imply things are fine re. SoLiD or not? >> > One test is passing at least, which is a good sign! > I think to say things are 'fine' we really need to develop a test suite > and run tests. There may be other ways, but that seems to be tried and > tested. > > Melvin, > > I am trying to avoid "OpenLink doesn't support SoLiD" cycles that keep on > reoccurring. > Got it. But it requires testing and possibly some bug fixing. > If there is a pattern that fails it should be identified and demonstrated. > This is where a test suite comes in handy. W3C working groups typically require 1-3 years for this. I think we need a similar process. There may be short cuts but it would normally require one dedicated tester. > As per this demo, my view point is simply as follows: > > [1] Start you Virtuoso instance > > [2] Perform RWW operations over HTTP using SoLiD patterns > > If something fails, it should be reported. > > Note my instance at idehen.net is a little unstable right now due to a > plethora of QA activities on other fronts. > > -- > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > Founder & CEO > OpenLink Software (Home Page: http://www.openlinksw.com) > > Medium Blog: https://medium.com/@kidehen > Blogspot Blog: http://kidehen.blogspot.com > Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen > Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen > Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Business Of Linked Data (BOLD)" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to business-of-linked-data-bold+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >
Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2016 07:52:39 UTC