- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:32:42 +0000
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-rww <public-rww@w3.org>, tav <tav@espians.com>
Excerpts from Melvin Carvalho's message of 2012-09-28 10:19:43 +0000: > On 28 September 2012 12:13, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>wrote: > > > Excerpts from Melvin Carvalho's message of 2012-09-28 09:55:16 +0000: > > > On 27 September 2012 23:39, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > > > > > > > You may want to add the following to the wiki on trust > > > > > > > > "WebID & eCommerce" http://bblfish.net/blog/2012/04/30/ > > > > > > > > Which shows how one can use linked data to fill up the > > > > trust story for official sites. > > > > > > > > > > Added, thanks Henry. > > > > > > There's also a very interesting conversation going on at web-payments on > > > Trust. > > > > > > We've for some time had the idea of IOUs between agents. I've proposed > > the > > > idea of trust as a credit line. > > > > > > "Alice trusts Bob but only to the tune of 10 euros" > > > > > > I think this is the last piece we need to get a really interesting web > > > economy started. > > I don't mind people *also* approach trust like a credit line, still > > finding it myself sort of naive approach. I would like to *also* focus on > > more sophisticated relation to trust. For example "I trust Melvin with > > editing RFC documents" but *at the same time* "I don't trust Melvin in > > spicing up curry", not that I would find Melvin having bad intentions but > > maybe he haven't taken enough time to practice cooking, or I just simply > > don't like his style of cuisine ;) > > > > I've founded quite interesting attempt guys from http://www.espians.com(or just Tav?) made with: > > http://www.trustmap.org > > ex: http://www.trustmap.org/#python/@tav > > > > Again plain trust without *context* I find not very useful... > > > > In Web we Trust ;) > > > > Of course context is important, yes. Reputation data leads to trust > inferences. Think data and algorithms are loosely coupled. > > Yes I like trustmap a lot, but it's currently a centralized website. With > a bit of tweaking we could make it a universal system, perhaps even a web > standard. It might require a bit of coding, if tav is interested .... it already looks quite like a graph ;) i think in direction: * replace hashtags with any URI (which still can have ex: http://www.hashtags.org/analytics/python/ ) * twitter handle with WebID * everyone can store contributed part of the graph oneself (something like http://remotestorage.io ) * trustmap.org becomes *one of many* aggregation services (mashup) * everyone can syndicate contributed part of a graph in any number of aggregation services ?
Received on Friday, 28 September 2012 10:33:10 UTC