Re: The necessity of hypermedia RDF and an approach to achieve it

On 9/17/12 2:06 PM, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> On Sunday 16. September 2012 17.47.50 Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>> Don't you get that via a graph based on an ontology like VoID? Worst
>> case, whatever might be missing is simply added by way of ontology
>> extension?
> I'm not sure I understood your question, but I think the question is partly
> yes and partly no: VoID already does the read-only parts of it, but has no
> support for rw-operations, and yes, what I do propose in my paper is a
> simple vocabulary for doing the rw-operations.

Yes, and that could compliment or even extend VoiD.

>
>>> The two different approaches are likely to make sense in different
>>> cases, but I can't make a clear recommendation in which cases.
>> I think we can arrive at a solution that's truly protocol agnostic. As
>> you know, REST isn't http: scheme specific
> Exactly. My solution is protocol agnostic.

Good!

Kingsley
>
> Best,
>
> Kjetil
>
>
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen