- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:08:54 +0200
- To: public-rww <public-rww@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhKWaU1n-hm-kYiWBaRtGyeNWjyTasOrjGRkFrqB7O24nw@mail.gmail.com>
An interesting discussion on the next improvements of the FOAF vocab going on at foaf-dev This post is a great example of how easy it will be to use foaf in html5 / rdfa lite A major appeal of these two is deployment simplicity in the newly standardised RDFa Lite (which btw pre-declares the 'foaf:' prefix). <div typeof="foaf:Person"> <a href="http://danbri.org/" property="foaf:homepage">I</a> attended <a href="http://learning.westergate.w-sussex.sch.uk/" property="foaf:schoolHomepage" >Westergate</a> school, and work at <a href="http://www.vu.nl/" property="foaf:workplaceHomepage">VU Amsterdam</a>. </div> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> Date: 12 June 2012 09:26 Subject: Re: [foaf-dev] Wishlists / requests for next rev of FOAF spec? To: Bob Ferris <zazi@smiy.org> Cc: foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org On 12 June 2012 09:16, Bob Ferris <zazi@smiy.org> wrote: > +1 for upgrading the majority of these terms to stable. However, I would > exclude the homepage relations (foaf:schoolHomepage and > foaf:workplaceHomepage), because one would rather link a workplace and/or > school resource today (which can even have a more detailed description), A major appeal of these two is deployment simplicity in the newly standardised RDFa Lite (which btw pre-declares the 'foaf:' prefix). <div typeof="foaf:Person"> <a href="http://danbri.org/" property="foaf:homepage">I</a> attended <a href="http://learning.westergate.w-sussex.sch.uk/" property="foaf:schoolHomepage">Westergate</a> school, and work at <a href="http://www.vu.nl/" property="foaf:workplaceHomepage">VU Amsterdam</a>. </div> Try pasting that into http://rdfa.info/play/ and you get @prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> . @prefix foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> . _:1 rdf:type foaf:Person; foaf:homepage <http://danbri.org/>; foaf:schoolHomepage <http://learning.westergate.w-sussex.sch.uk/>; foaf:workplaceHomepage <http://www.vu.nl/> . ... since we care about linked data, more information about those institutions ought to be available from their homepages; we don't need to fully describe them each time. How would this look if the orgs were described directly inline? Dan > or? > Re. modelling the "like" relation, I would also suggest to have a look at > the Association Ontology [1], whose approach was a bit different because it > modelled the "like" relation from the object direction and which is a bit > more verbose. > > Cheers, > > > Bo > > > [1] http://purl.org/ontology/ao/core# > > _______________________________________________ > foaf-dev mailing list > foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org > http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-dev _______________________________________________ foaf-dev mailing list foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-dev
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2012 16:09:26 UTC