Re: [foaf-dev] Wishlists / requests for next rev of FOAF spec?

On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:08:54 +0200
Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote:

> A major appeal of these two is deployment simplicity in the newly
> standardised RDFa Lite (which btw pre-declares the 'foaf:' prefix).

That's not a Lite-specific feature. Not even an (X)HTML-specific
feature. It's part of RDFa 1.1 Core.

-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>

Received on Thursday, 14 June 2012 18:02:35 UTC