Re: WebID Time Limit

welcome to absurdistan.

honestly, to me this has nothing to do with collaboration/consensus
building anymore, it's bending and bowing until there's a webID
definition that makes sure the community group is promoted a working
group.

btw.: i already left webID community group a week ago.

wkr turnguard

On Sat, 2012-12-08 at 12:49 +0100, Henry Story wrote:
> The old hash wiki page was too complex for a vote, with too much tit
> for tat, 
> and a lot of repetition. 
> 
> 
> So instead I put up a new hash wiki page
> 
> 
>    http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/wiki/WebID_Definition/hash2
> 
> 
> which contains only the arguments in favour of a position, and only
> the ones people
> have argued for strongest here. This is I know a subjective take on
> this, but this is what
> I had in mind as something to link to from the spec perhaps, or to use
> for the voting. 
> 
> 
> Is this reasonable? Perhaps with a few more changes?
> 
> 
> Henry
> 
> On 7 Dec 2012, at 22:35, Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:
> >         All,
> >         
> >         I'd like to propose that we pick the socially awkward issues
> >         of WebID and set a time limit on them. A time limit of the
> >         end of the year.
> >         
> >         A 2 hour meeting / skype / google hangout should be easily
> >         enough to resolve things and get consensus.
> >         
> >         We need to go in to 2013 with all of this behind us, and a
> >         clean productive slate ahead of us to really polish,
> >         implement, utilize and promote both WebID and WebID
> >         Protocol.
> > 
> > 
> > On top of that, at the end of this time limit, I'd like to suggest a
> > WBS poll open for a week or so. Here is why: the problem we've had
> > with the Friday telecons is that only a subset of the group is able
> > to make it and that's the only place we've taken any kind of vote.
> > 
> > 
> > Having a more flexible channel to accept votes would give a chance
> > to the less vocal people to also take part in the decision of the
> > group. I'm thinking about Alex, timbl, trueg, Nathan, Olivier
> > Berger, Jonathan Dray, Sergio Fernandez, many more. I'm not sure if
> > this group can make use of the W3 WBS system, but that's something
> > Henry can enquire about with Coralie maybe.
> > 
> > 
> > Steph.
> 
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
> 
> 

-- 
| Jürgen Jakobitsch, 
| Software Developer
| Semantic Web Company GmbH
| Mariahilfer Straße 70 / Neubaugasse 1, Top 8
| A - 1070 Wien, Austria
| Mob +43 676 62 12 710 | Fax +43.1.402 12 35 - 22

COMPANY INFORMATION
| web       : http://www.semantic-web.at/
| foaf      : http://company.semantic-web.at/person/juergen_jakobitsch
PERSONAL INFORMATION
| web       : http://www.turnguard.com
| foaf      : http://www.turnguard.com/turnguard
| g+        : https://plus.google.com/111233759991616358206/posts
| skype     : jakobitsch-punkt
| xmlns:tg  = "http://www.turnguard.com/turnguard#"