- From: bergi <bergi@axolotlfarm.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:29:38 +0200
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- CC: public-rww@w3.org
Am 13.09.2011 21:32, schrieb Melvin Carvalho: >> >> What do you think about my proposal? Somebody has a different approach? > > Another possible approach: > > use owl : sameAs > > If the agent has access return some triples, if not return FORBIDDEN How would you handle complex scenarios like G+ in RDF? One approach could be a resource per circle. But that would mean you have to duplicate some of your data. It would be possible to spread your triples in a way that there are no duplicates, but wouldn't that be more complicated to handle than describing the rules using the ontology I proposed? And how do you handle write access? If the data doesn't exist there is no resource to point to. Maybe there is a simple solution to the problems I've described, but currently I mainly see disadvantages.
Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2011 22:33:48 UTC