- From: Jean-Paul <jp.calbimonte@upm.es>
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 20:24:50 +0200
- To: "public-rsp@w3.org" <public-rsp@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+vpjuVTy6iCG++4hz=QXOybG1-zPCZtg0BV06TD2dg1OXKABw@mail.gmail.com>
Hello All, As already announced the F2F meeting will take place in sydney during the last part of the OrdRing Wshop: streamreasoning.org/events/ordring2013#program We might try to set up WebEx for those (many) who cannot travel to Sydney. I will let you know. We can use the F2F meeting to bootstrap the definition of requirements, which could be a necessary step. As we saw in the previous calls, we have several approaches and implementations, which target different scenarios. However, many of them share features (model, query language extensions, etc). Then, one first possible contribution of this CG is a report that systematically defines key requirements for an RDF stream (query) processor. I have seen other recent WGs and XGs define similar documents, which can give us an idea of what we could produce. * http://www.w3.org/TR/ldp-ucr/ * RDB2RDF WG: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdb2rdf-ucr/ * XG provenance: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/XGR-prov-20101214/#Requirements_for_provenance Once we have the requirements agreed within the CG, we can work on specifications of (meta)models and language extensions that Fulfill those requirements. What do you think? We can discuss about it. The proposed Agenda for the meeting is the following: - Summary of the first 'background' phone calls. - Propose an overall work plan. - Use cases and requirements: define scope, delegate responsibility - Planning on CG reports: * Use cases and requirements, RDF Stream (meta)model?, RDF Stream language extensions? - Discussion Best, -- Jean-Paul Calbimonte Ontology Engineering Group Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
Received on Tuesday, 15 October 2013 18:25:20 UTC