Re: More XAUR comments that need discussion

Hi all,

Here are the Github issue names to go along with the URIs below, just to 
make it easier for y'all to parse.
Apologies for not sending in the original mail.

[RNIB] 4.5 Interaction and target customization #87
[RNIB] 4.6 Voice commands #88
[RNIB] 4.8 Magnification context and resetting #89
[RNIB] 4.10 Gestural interfaces and interactions #90
4.4, 4.11, and 4.19 similarities, and standardizing personalization and 
text transformation #98

Thanks

Josh


> Joshue O Connor <mailto:joconnor@w3.org>
> Tuesday 28 April 2020 15:03
> Hi Jason,
>
> Here are some more interesting XAUR comments (with notes from me)for 
> discussion this week (or to add to the Q):
>
> https://github.com/w3c/apa/issues/87
> " '4.5 Interaction and target customization' -
>
> These would be useful for people with sight loss as well. For example, 
> requirement
> 4b, could be useful for people with tunnel vision or peripheral vision.
> 4c, again would help people with multiple disabilities including 
> mobility and sight loss."
>
> https://github.com/w3c/apa/issues/88
>
> "User Need 5 -Again, extremely important for people with sight loss.
>
> Add REQ 5b: Voice activation should preferably use native screen 
> readers / voice assistants rather than external devices to eliminate 
> the additional step needed to pair devices.
>
> Add REQ 5c: Feedback to the user must be audible or audible feedback 
> must be an option to enable people with sight loss to use the voice 
> interaction (i.e., a voice search feature must not display the results 
> on the screen without an option to have them read out)."
>
> https://github.com/w3c/apa/issues/89
>
> New draft requirement: Req 7.b: Where it makes sense (such as in 
> menus) interface elements can be enlarged and the menu reflowed to 
> enhance the usability of the interface up to a certain magnification 
> requirement.
>
>
> https://github.com/w3c/apa/issues/90
>
> "Interesting finding regarding enhanced sense of isolation when using 
> a headset.  Use of these things is not a requirement and should be 
> used - as needed to facilitate gestural interaction. This could be 
> mediate via some other technology.
>
> I like the use/suggestion of 'touch screen accessibility gestures on a 
> second screen device' being used for navigation or even some other 
> personalised type of interaction.
>
> Relates to 4.10 
> https://www.w3.org/TR/xaur/#gestural-interfaces-and-interactions "
>
>
> https://github.com/w3c/apa/issues/98
>
> Makes a point about some of the requirements being related but all 
> based on  text-based content might be presented in an immersive 
> environment - Suggests there should be one requirement for text 
> personalisation  and one for transformation,
>
> Thanks
>
> Josh


-- 
Emerging Web Technology Specialist/Accessibility (WAI/W3C)