W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rqtf@w3.org > December 2016

Miscellaneous questions/comments (was RE: Revised meeting agenda)

From: White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 15:37:29 +0000
To: David Sloan <dsloan@paciellogroup.com>, "public-rqtf@w3.org" <public-rqtf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BY2PR0701MB19909E2606C0BA3985EA6D05AB850@BY2PR0701MB1990.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Hi David,

I've attempted to respond to your comments below.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Sloan [mailto:dsloan@paciellogroup.com]
> Some comments for consideration:
> * I’d be interested in feedback on the approach I took to the
> security/authentication question—is it helpful for me to continue collating and
> recording relevant research papers and their authors in the way I have done? I’m
> happy to continue to do that, if so, or adjust the approach in response to
> feedback.
[Jason] Those of us at the meeting today were generally supportive of this approach of identifying literature relevant to each of the topics and noting the authors of these publications, who could serve as potential contacts.
> * Silver has started on two parallel processes of 1) recruiting stakeholders and 2)
> inviting a call to academics to contribute to research activities. For now, I think
> this means that the best approach RQTF can take is to encourage individual
> members to provide support to the process, rather than RQTF acting as the
> research arm of Silver. Perhaps in time, there may be specific question(s) Silver
> has that RQTF can take on as a group.
[Jason] In my discussion with participants in the Silver Task Force, it was indicated that they may seek specific methodological advice from RQTF regarding the development of surveys, interviews etc., to answer their research questions. RQTF would not be involved in the details of planning or conducting the research, as this is not our role. It was also suggested that specific issues may arise from the Silver Task Force's intended survey of WCAG-related literature about which RQTF may be consulted.

I think this is generally consistent with your above comments and would welcome any further questions or suggestions regarding carrying forward our collaboration with the Silver Task Force.

________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2016 15:38:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 17 January 2023 20:26:43 UTC