- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:17:58 -0400
- To: public-rif-wg@w3.org
I added support for importing RDF into riftr [0]. Using its partial translation to swi-prolog, it can now pass the RDF_Combination_Constant_Equivalence tests. I'm only doing simple entailment right now. I believe riftr could pass all the Core and BLD PET RDF-simple-entailment imports tests, except for the (significant) missing parts of the prolog translation for RIF in general (like most datatypes). So, to the extent that we can treat RIF-RDF combinations as an orthogonal feature, I think we can call it done. I don't actually think the other parts are very hard to do, given the framework I have in place, but I don't think I'll be able to give them any mindshare for the next couple of weeks. I believe this means we're now clear to request PR. As I said, since I'll just be getting off a plane, I may miss next week's meeting. Chairs, please consider this my proxy YES vote for going to PR on all our CR documents, if I don't make it. (Before we actually have the PR transition meeting with the Director, we'll need to get the responses-to-comments clearly documented, and draft a proper transition request, like [1]. I believe we'll also need to copy OWL on the XSD dependency [2].) -- Sandro [0] Yes, I still owe an implementation report. Source code is at http://github.com/sandhawke/riftr [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/PR_Transition_Request [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/PR-owl2-overview-20090922/#sotd-xml-dep
Received on Wednesday, 17 March 2010 20:18:02 UTC