Re: [ACTION-925] Review of RIF Guide

> I didn't (yet) add the OWL rdf:PlainLiteral document, since it is
> prominently mentioned in the Guide-indexed DTB document, and since
> http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/draft/rif-core/, linked from
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Sep/0007.html,
> doesn't mention it either.

FWIW, I agree, Harold.  rdf:PlainLiteral is not part of RIF, it's just a
bit of technology we happen to use, and happened to help develop.  I
consider it independent and don't think we should mention it in Guide.

   - s

Received on Saturday, 26 September 2009 04:45:35 UTC