- From: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:04:34 -0500
- To: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
This fulfills ACTION-633. In test cases, we have the (very minor) problem of how to advise implementors to treat the conclusion specifications - are they different documents or the same document as the test case premise. If they are the same document, then it is possible to reuse the namespace prefixes from the premise and not re-declare them in the conclusion. Also, if they are the same document then the "Local_Constant" test case [1] will not work properly. </chair> I suggest we approve the convention that the conclusion is the same document, and rewrite the local constant test case to use imports to achieve its effect. This convention appears to have been adopted in most test cases anyway. <chair> I am extremely wary of any proposal to change BLD in order to address what seems like a fairly simple problem. -Chris [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Local_Constant -- Dr. Christopher A. Welty IBM Watson Research Center +1.914.784.7055 19 Skyline Dr. cawelty@gmail.com Hawthorne, NY 10532 http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2009 21:05:11 UTC