- From: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:38:46 -0500
- To: Adrian Paschke <adrian.paschke@gmx.de>
- CC: public-rif-wg@w3.org
So you can assure him we are discussing it. ;-) -Chris Adrian Paschke wrote: > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: M. Scott Marshall [mailto:marshall@science.uva.nl] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Januar 2009 16:40 > An: 'Adrian Paschke'; adrian.paschke@biotec.tu-dresden.de > Betreff: OWL2 issues > > Hi Adrian, > > I heard of a datatype incompatibility between OWL2 and RIF that could > result in conflicting implementations. OWL2 considers 1^xsd:integer to > be the same as 1^xsd:float whereas RIF sees them as different. Something > like that.. Is this already being discussed somewhere? > > Also, from SWCG telcon minutes: "OWL 2 has a rule profile (OWL RL), > which is the fragment of OWL that can me implemented with a fairly > simple rule language -- it makes sense to have that profile specified in > RIF." > > Should these things be noted in OWL2 Call for comments? > > Best, > Scott > > > -- Dr. Christopher A. Welty IBM Watson Research Center +1.914.784.7055 19 Skyline Dr. cawelty@gmail.com Hawthorne, NY 10532 http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2009 16:39:33 UTC